It goes both ways I would say. But as a nr in new mexico I would support making the state stick to there state allocated tag split regardless if it cut nr tags would it be good for me no but it's good for the residents that live in that state.
You choose where you live if you made a poor...
Unintended consequences to you is probabaly anything that goes back to residents though.
I will give you this you are not shy about the fact if it benefits you it is OK
Probabaly opposite of what you think it would be. go tell them we are going to give rich landowners tags to sell to other rich nr so they can come here to kill a elk.
I am willing to bet with the current political climate in new mexico that looks much worse to them then you want to believe
You could have also drawn with those 5 points in the regular in wyoming but pointing out the special price gets you closer to that over priced single unit tag that pays large landowners way to much for a public resource.
Simple way to fix the eplus system is it should have to stick to the resident vs nr allocation of the regular draw that will drive up the cost of the nr tags in that system and they will sell and lower the price for the tags that go to residents and if they don't sell the default back to the...
How many of those non hunters would like to see hunting gone? Which looks worse and could convinced the general public to limit one? rich landowners selling tags to rich hunters or average resident hunters just wanting a tag to put some food on there table.
It doesn't do crap for the state...
What you are missing with this argument is there is likely a larger number of those non-hunters that would be against this program maybe the residents of new mexico should point out this fact to the non hunters that larger land owners are selling kill permits for a state owned resource to the...